Attendance
- The question
- When was someone present?
- Useful context
- Attendance event and schedule
- The boundary
- Presence does not establish completed work.
Public product preview. Not every described capability is available. Join the waitlist to discuss access; existing customers can sign in.
DRYVN TIME & WORK
A total of eight hours tells you how much time was recorded. It takes an assignment, an activity and a review decision to explain the work behind it. Dryvn connects timesheets to assigned work and team-defined output measures, without treating every quantity as the same kind of result.
| Assignment / activity | Hours | Reported output |
|---|---|---|
| Service guide localization | 5.5 | 1,200 words |
| Customer support cases | 2 | 8 cases |
| Internal coordination | 0.5 | No output measure |
Words and cases describe different work. They are not added into a combined output total.
An illustrative approved timesheet records 5.5 hours of localization with 1,200 words, 2 hours of support with 8 cases, and 0.5 hours of internal work. The hours total eight; words and cases remain separate.
ONE CONTINUOUS EXAMPLE
A delivery lead assigns localization work using a work item and its measurement unit. The employee records 5.5 hours against that work and reports 1,200 words. The same day also contains two hours of support and half an hour of internal coordination.
The employee submits the working period for review. The assigned approver can approve or reject it; a rejected week remains available for correction and resubmission. Approved output is then available to the authorized report.
The diagram follows just the localization row. It does not imply that attendance events automatically populate a timesheet, or that a submitted record has already passed review.
The employee records time against the assigned work and reports output in the configured unit.
The assigned approver reviews the timesheet. A submitted quantity is pending, not an approved result.
The approved localization output contributes to the report for the selected metric and date range.
A rejected week can be corrected and resubmitted through the existing time-recording workflow. Approval is a review outcome, not an assessment of the work’s quality.
The same localization example moves from recorded work to a submitted timesheet and then an approved output report. Submission and approval are separate states.
MEASURES THE TEAM UNDERSTANDS
A localization team may count words against a work item. A support team may count cases. A service-delivery team may record agreed deliverables. These are examples of team-defined measurement, not connections to an external ticketing or delivery tool.
Keep the definition of each measure clear: what counts, which work it belongs to and the period being reported. A report filtered to a word-based metric should not silently combine that quantity with cases.
Operations leads can use the report’s employee and work-item views to inspect reported quantities in context. Approved quantities form the authoritative view; any optionally included submitted quantities are identified separately.
DIFFERENT RESPONSIBILITIES
Which assignment and activity did this time support? What output did I report, and does the week need correction before resubmission?
Is the submitted period ready to approve, or should it be rejected for correction? The decision belongs to the assigned review process.
What approved output is visible for this metric, period and scope? What context is needed before comparing employees or work items?
KEEP THE INTERPRETATION HONEST
An approved output quantity records what has passed the configured review. It does not by itself establish quality, customer value, effort or individual productivity. Different assignments may carry different complexity even when they use the same unit.
Use totals to locate a useful question, then look at the work and its context. An authorized CSV export can support further analysis; the important point is to keep the metric, period, unit and status with the exported information.
For schedules, attendance and absence around the working day, explore the wider Time & Work page. This page focuses on recording, allocation, review and reporting.
QUESTIONS, ANSWERED
No. Attendance events describe presence in their schedule and timezone context. Timesheets describe recorded time against activities and assignments. This page does not promise automatic conversion from punches to timesheet entries.
The existing work model supports measurement units, work metrics and reported output associated with assigned work. The example keeps 1,200 words and 8 cases separate; it totals only the eight recorded hours.
The employee can correct a rejected week and resubmit it through the supported workflow. Submitted and approved states remain distinct, and the assigned approver makes the review decision.
Approved output is the authoritative reporting basis. Where the existing report offers an option to include submitted output, pending quantities are identified separately and should not be presented as approved results.
The existing team-output report supports an authorized CSV export. Keep the selected metric, reporting period, unit and approval status with the data when analyzing it elsewhere.
A quantity alone cannot establish either. Work complexity, quality and organizational conditions need their own context and human interpretation. No automatic productivity score is promised here.
A PRACTICAL NEXT STEP
Bring an example of your assignments and measures. We can discuss the time-recording and reporting scope available to your team.